Week Four Results

[xpanda]

IMPORTANT!

I've converted the old results format (ie 7-2) to a dollar denomination. PLEASE CHECK YOUR WEEK THREE TOTAL for accuracy!!! If you find any errors in my grading and/or math, please notify me asap in this thread.

You have until Sunday kickoff to report any errors to me.

Thanks!!!!

Player      	~P1~	~P2~	~P3~	~P4~	Wk 4	Wk 3	YTD
shotgun	        100	100	-110	100	190	470 	660 
po69	        -110	100	-110	100	-20	470 	450 
sharky99	100	100	-110	100	190	160 	350 
goodcall	100	100	100	100	400	-160 	240 
iceman	        100	100	100	-110	190	50 	240 
blueedwards	100	-110	100	100	190	-50 	140 
sam10	        100	100	100	100	400	-260 	140 
zapster	        -110	100	100	-110	-20	160 	140 
puckhandler	100	100	-110	-110	-20	150 	130 
sportsavant	100	-110	100	-110	-20	150 	130 
trytrytry	-110	100	100	100	190	-60 	130 
thewolf	        100	-110	100	-110	-20	50 	30 
gskiman	        -110	100	100	100	190	-260 	-70 
theticket22	100	100	100	-110	190	-260 	-70 
wannabewhale	100	100	100	-110	190	-260 	-70 
joeyfitz	-110	-110	-110	100	-230	150 	-80 
juluvg	        -110	100	-110	100	-20	-60 	-80 
augustus	100	100	-110	100	190	-360 	-170 
chriscol	100	100	100	-110	190	-360 	-170 
nopunter	100	-110	-110	-110	-230	60 	-170 
ttinco	        -110	-110	-110	100	-230	60 	-170 
shdw01	        -110	-110	-110	100	-230	50 	-180 
sherwood	100	-110	-110	100	-20	-160 	-180 
stump	        -110	100	100	-110	-20	-160 	-180 
forgetWS	-110	100	-110	100	-20	-270 	-290 
cincy	        -110	100	100	-110	-20	-370 	-390 
smoke	        -110	-110	-110	100	-230	-160 	-390 
xpanda	        -110	100	100	100	190	-580 	-390 
calvinty	100	-110	100	-110	-20	-580 	-600 
dougconnect	-110	-110	-110	100	-230	-370 	-600 
ensign_lee	-110	100	100	100	190	-790 	-600 
gameRgame	100	-110	-110	100	-20	-580 	-600 
jman	        -110	-110	-110	100	-230	-580 	-810 
thomas	        -110	100	-110	-110	-230	-680 	-910 
betit	        -110	-110	100	-110	-230	-690 	-920 
viejo	        100	-110	-110	-110	-230	-690 	-920 
neverbeen	out	out	out	out	#VALUE!	-160 	#VALUE!

 

[goodcall]

I think you graded TTinCo's Detroit pick a loser

 

[goodcall]

looks good though...thanks!

 

[xpanda]

You are correct, I did! Fixed in the spreadsheet, which I will repost once all edits are in (you can't believe what an unbelievable pain in the ass posting in that format is, for us Mac users.)

Thanks, GD.

 

[PO69]

If it is easier for you, I would prefer leaving the records in the old format. It seems to be less of a hassle possibly for you

 

[theticket_22]

i wasnt -260 last week....i was -10 i believe...i went 1-1-2..(week 3)

 

[goodcall]

i wasnt -260 last week....i was -10 i believe...i went 1-1-2..(week 3)

I think that column means "through Week 3"

 

[gskiman]

If it is easier for you, I would prefer leaving the records in the old format. It seems to be less of a hassle possibly for you

I will 2nd that.
Wins-Losses-Pushes easier to keep tabs on.
We all know how to do the conversion to $$.

 

[chriscol]

yes, leave it as it was...as all lines are -110 anyway it s easy for all to have a quick overview.

thx for work anyway

 

[Zapster]

Gotta echo what the guys are saying. The + and - method is needed for baseball with all the money lines. With all games at -110 in football though, straight up wins/losses/ties works perfectly fine....and is how this contest was tabulated for the past 3 years.

But please understand that Xpanda's work is much appreciated.

 

[xpanda]

i wasnt -260 last week....i was -10 i believe...i went 1-1-2..(week 3)

The -260 reflects your YTD at the end of Week Three, not the total for that week on its own.

Regarding the format of the grading, let me talk to SS about it first. We both prefer working in the format above and wanted the grading format on the site to be consistent contest-wide. It is far easier to grade each contest the same way, overall. But, I will defer to him with your requests.

 

[SportSavant]

guys, beleive it or not this is 10 times faster for us than the other method.....

I will see if we can add a win/loss column tho,

 

[xpanda]

A column each for wins and losses is relatively easy. I can add that if posters wish.

 

[PO69]

I would rather see the standings the other way, but I can live with it either way. I know that this way doesnt show how many games that we tied if that matters for anything

 

[SportSavant]

I would rather see the standings the other way, but I can live with it either way. I know that this way doesnt show how many games that we tied if that matters for anything

If Tanya adds a three columns, one for WINS one for LOSSES and one for TIES, then nothing shold be missing.

For the record, the above format is the format that has been used for ALL RX contests for a long time now, even contests where all the gams are -110. the only reason it wasnt being graded like that up until now is becoz Jman did not have EXCEL on his computer

 

[PO69]

Good enough! Shame on JMAN for not having a new computer with real programs on it! He bought a new one supposedly with that $2000, I would be SHOCKED if it didnt come with excel packed on

 

[VIEJODINOSAUR]

Turn that damn sheet upside down and I am in first place...pay me!!

 

[PO69]

I offered to have last place win $300. Or at least give $500 to 5th place but was shot down. At this moment, I am glad that the idea was shot down, but I could fall quickly with an 0-4 week

 

[TTinCO]

I think you graded TTinCo's Detroit pick a loser

:toast: Thanks!